The Outcome Mindset: Why Great PMs Prioritize Solving Over Shipping
As a PM, if you think shipping features is enough, this article will show you why focusing on solving real problems is the game changer
Hi 👋! You are reading one of my free articles - I hope it helps you level up your PM skills. Want to go deeper? My premium subscribers get exclusive frameworks and strategies I don’t share anywhere else - content that has helped hundreds of product managers land better roles and make bigger impact.
Ready to accelerate your product career? Subscribe now for premium access and join a community of exceptional PMs gaining an edge every week.
Now, let’s dive into today’s insights…
I’ve sat across from hundreds of product managers who were doing everything “right” yet failing where it mattered most. Their standups were tight, their backlogs were groomed, and their execution velocity charts looked impressive.
And yet, the needle wasn’t moving.
This is the moment of truth in every product career – when you realize you have been executing a perfect process for the wrong problem. This is the difference between being busy and being impactful - a gap that separates those who manage projects from those who transform products.
The Comfortable Trap of Project Thinking
I’ll be honest: project thinking is seductive. It gives us the illusion of control in a chaotic environment: define requirements → lock scope → execute → deliver.
Project thinking works like a charm when the path is clear. If a person is building a house or launching an email campaign, the steps are clear. You’ve done it before.
But product work? It’s a whole different game.
It’s messy and unpredictable. Your customers say they want faster horses when they really need cars. Markets and trends zigzag overnight, and finding product-market fit feels like hunting for treasure without a map.
This is why project thinking is critically dangerous – it feels productive while leading to the most expensive mistake in product work: flawlessly executing the wrong plan.
📌 This is where Product Thinking becomes the Game-Changer.
Product thinking flips everything on its head. It starts with “What problem are we solving?” not “What are we building?” It’s obsessed with outcomes, not outputs. Product thinking-
Forget features shipped → focuses on: did we solve real problems?
Forget story points → focuses on: did we change user behavior?
Forget hitting deadlines → focuses on: did we move business metrics as fast and repeatably as we could?
This approach demands brutal honesty. You have to admit what you don’t know. Test your assumptions. And be ready to pivot when your brilliant idea crashes into reality.
You will discover that you stop falling in love with your solutions and start committing to outcomes that matter.
The Hidden Trap That Derails Even the Best PMs
One of the quickest ways to derail a product career isn’t poor technical skills or communication; it’s confusing a perfect plan with a perfect outcome. I’ve seen this happen when you create a beautiful roadmap, and everyone loves it. You feel like a rock star. But then reality hits: your competitors launch something new, customer problems shift, or technology changes “overnight.”
Suddenly your perfect plan doesn’t fit anymore. But the team has invested weeks of work. Executives have announced timelines. Your reputation is on the line.
Most teams then ship features anyway – building experiences that no longer matter while the market moves on without them.
What follows is painfully predictable:
Missed opportunities as you execute against yesterday’s priorities.
Wasted engineering capacity building features nobody wants.
Frustrated stakeholders wondering why results don’t materialize.
And eventually, a loss of trust in product leadership.
The product thinking approach flips the risk equation. You don’t assume you know the answer – you design systems to reveal it. You don’t eliminate uncertainty – you systematically reduce it.
You aren’t trying to be right from the start. You're trying to get things right as quickly as possible.
1. When Not Building Was the Breakthrough
A few years back, I led a product aimed at helping university students (recent graduates) showcase their accomplishments to employers. The “obvious” next step on our roadmap was to build a sophisticated portfolio tool with all the bells and whistles students “needed.”
Engineering estimated six months. The design had beautiful mockups. Stakeholders were aligned.
We followed the classic project approach: requirements → design → build → launch.
But as we dug deeper into the problem space, we discovered something unexpected. Students weren’t struggling with portfolio tools – they were overwhelmed by the paradox of choice. They already had LinkedIn, GitHub, Behance, personal websites, and a dozen other platforms.
Our breakthrough wasn’t building another tool – it was simplifying the decision process. We created clear guidance on which existing platforms worked best for different types of work, standardized what employers expected to see, and streamlined how students received feedback.
No new code. No six-month build. Just clarity that unlocked immediate value.
That pivot wasn’t about abandoning the plan – it was about staying focused and respecting the outcome.
How to Handle Stakeholders Who Want Certainty
I can already hear you saying: “Nice theory, but my boss wants dates. My stakeholders need roadmaps. And my team is asking what to build next.”
Look, I get it. I’ve been there too.
Yes, your executives need forecasts. Yes, marketing needs launch dates. And absolutely, your team deserves clarity.
But here’s the secret that changed my career: Timing is everything.
Give them the certainty they crave – just not before you’ve done the discovery work to be confident that you are solving the right problem.
Now, let’s discuss the mindset shift that changed my career.
1. Don’t confuse confidence with commitment
Early in the product lifecycle, you must be confident in your process, not your solution. Share your hypotheses, your learning plan, and your decision criteria transparently.
Then, once you have validated both problem and solution, make what Marty Cagan calls a “high-integrity commitment” – one backed by evidence, not just enthusiasm.
Counterintuitively, this approach builds more trust than false certainty ever could. When stakeholders see that you’re systematic about reducing risk before committing resources, they develop confidence in both your process and your judgment.
The Career Fork in the Road
By default, some PMs perfect the art of execution. They become human Gantt charts - reliable, efficient, and respected for getting stuff done. Their careers plateau as high-level project managers.
Then some leap through product thinking. These are the people who get pulled into the big strategy meetings. They are the ones the CEO asks, “What should we build next?” not just “When will it be ready?”
The difference is that the second group isn’t just shipping features - they’re connecting the dots between user problems and business growth. They’re not just following the roadmap - they’re creating it.
These product leaders:
Don’t just manage backlogs → they shape strategy.
Don’t just listen to customers → they uncover unspoken needs.
Don’t just coordinate development → they connect business outcomes to user problems.
Don’t just deliver on time → they deliver what matters.
They thrive in ambiguity not because they have a tolerance for chaos, but because they have frameworks for creating clarity where none exists.
That’s the difference between being a builder and being a leader.
Practical Shifts That Signal Your Evolution
This transformation shows up in how you approach everyday product work:
And perhaps most crucially:
This evolution happens when you realize that in the product, being wrong isn’t the worst outcome – staying wrong is.
The Essence of Product Leadership
This is the truth I wish someone had told me earlier in my career: If you are leading a product team, your primary job isn’t shipping features. It’s navigating uncertainty.
Your unique value isn’t execution (though that matters). It is your ability to make the complex simple, to find the signal in the noise, and to translate ambiguous user needs into concrete value delivery.
That’s the evolution from project thinking to product thinking. It’s what separates those who build features from those who build products that matter.
So ask yourself honestly: are you still validating your worth through output, or have you leaped to leading through outcomes?
Because ultimately, greatness in product isn’t about what you ship.
It’s about what you change.
ICYMI: Traditional product management sticks to a project-based approach, but reality rarely follows that neat structure. That’s when PMs get stuck in ambiguity. These past issues shed light on ‘‘how-to’’ product the right way:
Every feature prioritization, roadmap decision, and user story you craft is subtly shaped by unseen cognitive biases. Here’s the playbook smart PMs rely on to consistently ship the right products.
Great products still fail when the fundamentals are ignored. So how do you keep your product team focused, aligned, and on track? Read about the guiding principles here 👇🏾
